Introduction
For
decades anti-pornography feminist theorists have been articulating how
pornography is problematic. Many feminists are familiar with the ways in which
pornography affects women, but there is still much to be discovered in regards to
how pornography affects men. We live in a patriarchal culture and society that
is conditioned to objectify women, thus most men are conditioned to believe
that participating in the patriarchal viewing of pornography is completely
acceptable. Without recognizing the problem with pornography it becomes
extremely difficult to confront this problem. Without confronting,
understanding, and solving; this problem it cannot be resolved; therefore
pornography will continue to flourish and infect future generations of men as
it has our generation and the generations before. We continue to be surrounded
by pornography. There are pornographic themes present throughout all outlets of
our media, and access to pornography is as easy as the simple click of a
button. In this pornified culture, where pornography is the norm, we fail to
recognize how this problem is truly affecting the men of our society. We fail
to recognize that we are a culture of men who are secretly addicted to
pornography.
One
might ask the questions: Why is pornography such a problem? How does it truly
affect men? Why do we tolerate pornography if it is so problematic? How can
this mass addiction be secret? And finally, is there a solution? In order to answer
these questions we must re-examine the problem with pornography and its effects
on men, while exposing the heteronormative masculine gendered male’s secret
addiction to pornography.
The
Problem with Pornography
The word pornography literally means “writing or drawing
of female captive or slave”, from the greek words porne and graphos. In its
name alone pornography labels women as slaves or captives-a possession of men,
an object. We are taught that a man may do whatever he wishes with his belongings.
When women are reduced to mere objects for male pleasure and no longer seen as
a person of equity, a man may do as he pleases. In pornography the man does as
he pleases, regardless if the woman is feeling pain and regardless of consent.
There are pornographic films in which women are manipulated to board buses and
receive compensation for sexual intercourse, afterwards they are shoved from
the vehicle without pay in a strange and unfamiliar neighborhood, and the men
laugh as they drive off. There are pornographic films where a sleeping woman is
violated by a man who sneaks into her bedroom. There are films where women are
just violently raped. Pornography conditions men to be rapists. In his book Refusing to be a Man, John Stoltenberg states that, “Pornography
tells lies about women. But pornography tells the truth about men” (Stoltenberg
107). This blunt statement simply reflects the truth that pornography portrays
women to enjoy being victims of violence and rape. In saying that pornography
tells the truth about men, he is claiming most viewers of pornography are men
and through that viewing they are being conditioned to objectify women. A
misogynistic view of women is being enforced upon them by other men-the
creators of pornography. In one experiment students who were exposed to
pornography containing violent themes were proven to be more likely to develop
psychotic tendencies (Linz 68). Through pornographic films such as the Girls Gone Wild series, men are shown
that it is acceptable to perform date rape upon a woman as long as she is
intoxicated. Many men group together and visit bars, with this as the sole intention
as the reason for even going out. This is just one example of how pornography
conditions men to be rapists.
Aside from promoting violence towards women as being
acceptable, there are problems derived from pornography that may affect men on
a more personal level. In an article for New York Magazine entitled The Porn Myth, Naomi Wolf argues that
pornography turns men off from having real sexual intercourse. She explains
that mass exposure to women in pornography makes it difficult to find a woman
in real life who is “porn-worthy” (Wolf). These “porn-worthy” women would have
fake breasts, be shaved, anally bleached, and tan to name just a few physical
traits. On top of being incapable of
being aroused by a real woman, the male who is used to achieving orgasm via
voyeurism is now suddenly in a position that his brain does not associate with
having an erection-the position of the person who is actually practicing
intercourse. This leads to erectile dysfunction.
When a man and woman are involved in an intimate
relationship, pornography can be quite problematic. In my personal life I could
not tell you how many times I have seen couples torn apart by pornography. Most
women do not feel comfortable with the fact that their partner is masturbating
secretly to other women, instead of just having sexual intercourse with her.
For obvious reasons that strike at women’s insecurities, physically and
emotionally, this always causes conflict in a relationship. Often these men
become incapable of being aroused by their partners and begin to see
intercourse with them as a chore. When men look at pornography they destroy what
they could be experiencing sexually with another person. Stoltenberg explains
this type of situation when he states that:
What a camera can see
is not remotely equivalent to what a person can express and perceive with
another person during sex. But if what a camera can see becomes a man’s
operational standard for “good sex”—If a man models his sexual behavior after
that which is displayable on a screen and if, in addition, he becomes like a
camera in relation to the person he is with –then a crucial potential for
erotic communication has been occluded. (Stoltenberg 98)
What the camera sees is
what the viewer sees, and nothing else. No emotions, just a chemical surge than
you can turn off and on at will, a version of sex that you can turn off and
file away, and therefore not deal with any aftermath. It’s the equivalent of
having sex with someone and then throwing them out and locking the door, or
having sex with someone and then throwing them out of the bus.
As usual, when it comes to pornography, there is a lot of
woman blaming. Men blame women for being in the films, while simultaneously blaming
women for the reason that men look at pornography. Sometimes the reason is
because they are bored of their partner and they want them to be sexier,
sometimes it’s because they cannot find any women who will have sex with them.
A lot of men feed into the argument that pornography empowers women and the
women are strong and independent. Pornography is a man’s business where a man
tells you what to do, how to act, what to wear, and who to have sex with. When
you are a woman and you watch or participate in pornography, you disregard all
the women and even men that it affects. Ariel Levy, author of Female Chauvinist
Pigs, hits the nail on the head when she says, “But if you are the exception
that proves the rule, and the rule is that women are inferior, you haven’t made
any progress” (117).
Pornography continues to condition men as enactors of
sexual violence towards women. Pornography continues to teach us how to have
sex while providing in romantic partnerships by playing off insecurities and
destroying erotic communication. Pornography causes erectile dysfunction in
men, and the inability to be attracted to real and natural women. These are
just some of the problems with pornography.
A
Conditioned Acceptance
If pornography is so problematic then one must question
why our culture and society seems to be so accepting of it? Even if you are not
directly looking at pornography, you are still constantly exposed to it. Turn
on your television for about five minutes and surf through the channels; you
are bound to at least see an advertisement that reduces a woman in to some type
of product for male consumption. This is just like pornography therefore it
serves the same purpose. The media is the tool used by patriarchy to condition people
to do whatever it wants. Just as we are conditioned to buy Coca-Cola even
though they kill South Americans, just as we are conditioned to buy fast food
even though it’s killing us, we are conditioned to practice sexism.
We
are so hardwired by the media to accept porn that most men do not even begin to
recognize pornography as problematic. In order to put my theories to the test I
surveyed a group of twenty men on pornography. When asked if pornography is a
problem in our society, nineteen out of twenty men answered no. When asked if
they thought that pornography causes problems in relationships, only five men
answered yes with one of the five men going on to say that it was only a
problem if your partner catches you. When asked to answer if they regularly
looked at pornography, eight men answered no and twelve answered yes. When
asked if any of their male friends looked at pornography, all twenty men
answered yes. Although I was only able to survey twenty men, the results were
disturbing; pornography is completely acceptable by the majority of men.
Sexism
of course, does not look good on paper. Most people at least want to believe
that they want equity for all humans. So why is pornography so acceptable when
it displays sexism so blatantly? I suggest that it is because pornography is a
necessary weapon of patriarchy used to instill sexism in the masses.
Stoltenberg explains the patriarchal system’s need for pornography quite
splendidly when he states:
Pornography keeps
sexism sexy. It keeps sexism necessary for some people to have sexual feelings.
It makes reciprocity make you go limp. It makes mutuality leave you cold. It
makes tenderness and intimacy and caring make you feel like you’re going to
disappear into a void. It makes justice the opposite of erotic; it makes
injustice a sexual thrill. Pornography exploits every experience in people’s
lives that imprisons sexual feelings—pain, terrorism, punishment, dread, shame,
powerlessness, self-hate—and would have you believe that it frees sexual
feelings. In fact the sexual freedom represented by pornography is the freedom
of men to act sexually in ways that keep sex a basis for inequality. (Stoltenberg
114)
Through
the media and through pornography on its own, it becomes clear why we are so
accepting of porn. We are conditioned to accept it.
A
Secret Addiction
You are addicted to said activity when you cannot stop
participating in an activity that causes harm to yourself and those around you.
Our society recognizes addictions to gambling, alcohol, illegal drugs, etc.,
but only the extremely religious recognize pornography addiction as a serious
addiction. How can this be? We have learned how pornography is harmful to the
viewer and those involved with the viewer. If a man cannot stop looking at
pornography he is obviously addicted to it. As we have discussed in the section
above, we are conditioned to accept that men look at pornography. That is why
this addiction is a secret, because it is kept a secret and because patriarchy
needs men to be addicted to pornography.
In reference to the secret addiction Stoltenberg states:
The picture pornography exposes is not a pretty one;
pornography reveals in the sexuality of the men for whom it is made an
addiction to force and coercion for arousal, eroticized racial hatred, a
despisal of the female, a fetishizing of erection and devotion to penetration,
an obsession with interpersonal power differentials, an eroticized commitment
to violence- and through it all an ugly striving to assert masculinity over and
against women. (Stoltenberg 106).
This
statement exemplifies just how serious we should be taking this mass addiction
to pornography.
According to Forbes.com the porn industry
profited 3.9 billion dollars in 2001, with one billion of that profit from
internet pornography (Ackman). Telecrunch.com reported that internet
pornography alone profited 2.84 billion in 2007 (Arrignton). Obviously a lot of
money is being spent on pornography, and the money that is profited does not
reflect how much the actual customer is spending on pornography. Most of the
time when someone can get something for free rather than have to pay a hefty
subscription fee, they will opt for free. There are thousands of free
pornography sites on the internet; I would be willing to argue that these free
sites receive more visitors than the pay sites. In an article for WebMD.com,
Matt McMillen mentions a survey that says only 26 percent of male internet
users visit pornography (McMillen). Using the profit statistics above and the
fact that many men do not even pay for porn, I would argue that the men in this
survey are lying. Why would these men be lying about using pornography? The
answer is simple; they are addicted and in denial that their pornography
addiction is any kind of a problem, just like addicts of any drug.
A Solution
Pornography is not only problematic for
women, but also problematic for men. Pornography destroys heteronormative
relationships, by dismantling communication and creating a false sense of what
a man perceives as woman and sex altogether. Pornography is instilled into our brains
as a normal part of society and we are conditioned by the media to accept it.
Most masculine gendered heteronormative males are secretly addicted to
pornography in some form or another while this addiction is being treated as
natural behavior. It is difficult when faced with these types of problems
involving deep rooted and internalized sexism to come up with a solution.
Simply calling for a ban of pornography could only make the matter worse, with
bootlegging and underground snuff films. As the research by Larry Baron in his
scholarly article Pornography and Gender
Equality: An Empirical Analysis states, regulation of pornography is not a
solution to women’s oppression. I would suggest better education for our future
generations. Perhaps implementing gender studies into our public education
could help future generations begin to understand concepts and ideas that
children of today are simply not being exposed to. In a world where members of our society are
actually equipped with educations on gender equality, pornography may fade away;
I would like to believe that when most people are well informed they make the
right decisions. But before we can truly make any changes, we must realize
whose world we are living in and what we must do to take it back. In his book Getting Off: Pornography and the End of
Masculinity, Robert Jenson leaves us with this thought:
At the moment, it’s the
pornographers’ world. They are the ones telling the most influential stories
about gender and power and sex. But that victory is just for the moment, if we
can face ourselves and then build a movement that challenges them. We have a
lot of work to do. So, before we debate the meaning of the First Amendment,
let’s discuss the meaning of a double penetration. Before we look at the law,
let’s look in the mirror.
Works
Cited
Ackman, Dan. "How Big Is
Porn?" Forbes. Forbes Magazine, 25 May 2001. Web. 23 Apr. 2012.
Arrington, Michael. "Internet
Pornography Stats." TechCrunch. 12 May 2007. Web. 23 Apr. 2012.
Barron, Larry.
"Pornography and Gender Equality: An Empirical Analysis." The
Journal of Sex Research. Part 2 27.3 (1990): 363-80. JSTOR. Web. 24
Feb. 2012.
Jensen, Robert. Getting Off: Pornography and the End of
Masculinity. Cambridge MA: South End, 2007. Print.
Levy, Ariel. Female
Chauvinist Pigs: Women and the Rise of Raunch Culture. New York: Free,
2005. Print.
Linz, Daniel.
"Exposure to Sexually Explicit Materials and Attitudes toward Rape: A
Comparison of Study Results." The Journal of Sex Research 26.1
(1989): 50-84. JSTOR. Web. 24 Feb. 2012.
McMillen, Matt. "Why Men Like
Porn." WebMD. WebMD. Web. 23 Apr. 2012.
Stoltenberg, John. Refusing
to Be a Man: Essays on Sex and Justice. Portland, Or.: Breitenbush, 1989.
Print.
Wolf, Naomi. "The
Porn Myth." New York Magazine. New York Media LLC. Web. 24 Feb.
2012.
This is absolutely true. I agree with all the points being tackled here. This is the reality of it.
ReplyDeleteporno
hi! I don't quite agree with what you wrote in this post. I'm afraid you take pornography a little too seriously. you seem to forget that people KNOW that what they see in porn movies isn't real. one knows that the women he sees in porn movies are acting and that all they are presumably thinking about while being filmed is "am I in the right position? where are the cameras now? hope I'll finally manage to pay those bills" but for the benefit of entertainment he pretends to believe that they are just some very sexually disponible and disposable women. it's the same as with ordinary movies: people pretend to believe that what they see is real, but they very well know it isn't. people are never shocked when they see someone dying in a movie, because they know it's not real, but most people would be utterly shocked if they happened to see a movie about someone dying for real. so I don't think pornography condones rape; on the contrary, I believe that most men if they happened to see a movie about a woman being actually raped would find it shocking and disturbing, certainly not arousing. this is not to say that massive consumption of pornography can't lead to unhealthy behaviours, but then anything is unhealthy when excessively pursued. personally I don't hink pornography is about patriarchy perpetuating its power over women, I think it is more akin to pink novels, in that they both present some sort of ready-made and disposable fantasy world you can indulge dreaming about (of course you choose one world or the other depending on whether what you want to dream about is gigantic-boobbed sex-slaves or handsome gentlemen who just want you to be the queen of their castles) but where you would never really want to live for long. I'm not talking of escapism, I think it's more like some kind of psychological (more then physical -I don't think anybody feels a physical urge to watch porn) urge to which a surrogated relief is given. and as for gay porn, how can you say it promotes patriarchal stereotypes when all it is about is men taking it up their ass, which is the most unlikely thing any "real man" would ever do? you say that gay porn movies are misogynistic because they never portray women, but you must concede then women would be quite out of place in any such movie. and when you say that gay porn movies do not portray real gay men because the performers are usually hyper-masculine men (most of whom you assume to be straight in their real life, which is to be proved) you seem to imply that gay men can't be masculine. that sounds a little prejudiced.
ReplyDeleteI really didn't want to be polemical, it's only that this subject (sexuality, representations of it and their significance) is so fascinating and thought-provoking that I couldn't help grasping the possibility of discussing it with someone who's being devoting so much attention to it!
@hector you're missing so many points here...
ReplyDelete